In September 2017, Oracle officially deprecated Java Web Start (JWS), leaving many enterprises and developers searching for a reliable alternative to deploy Java applications over the web. While several solutions have emerged, Webswing stands out as a robust and versatile option. This article explores why Webswing is a superior choice compared to traditional JWS and other alternatives like OpenWebStart, IcedTea-Web, and trivrost.

Challenges with Java Web Start

Java Web Start was designed to simplify the deployment of Java applications by downloading and launching the necessary JAR files specified in a JNLP file. However, this approach comes with several significant drawbacks:

  1. Time and Network Bandwidth: Downloading JAR files can be time-consuming and requires considerable network bandwidth, especially for large applications. This can lead to delays and inefficiencies, particularly in environments with limited connectivity.
  2. Security Risks: The JAR files downloaded via JWS can be decompiled, potentially exposing the application's source code to unauthorized access. This poses a serious security risk, especially for applications containing sensitive or proprietary information.

Webswing: A Secure and Efficient Solution

Webswing addresses these issues by offering a server-side solution that protects the source code and enhances deployment efficiency.

  1. Source Code Protection: Unlike JWS, Webswing runs the Java application on the server, eliminating the need to download JAR files to the client machine. This server-side execution ensures that the source code remains secure and inaccessible to unauthorised users.
  2. Minimal Client Load: By leveraging server hardware to run the application, Webswing significantly reduces the computational load on the client machine. This allows organisations to use inexpensive client devices without compromising performance. Additionally, Webswing can run on a variety of devices, including handheld devices, which JWS cannot support.

Comparing Alternatives

OpenWebStart

OpenWebStart is an open-source implementation of JWS, providing similar features. However, it requires installation on each client machine, which can be cumbersome and time-consuming for large-scale deployments.

IcedTea-Web

IcedTea-Web offers a JWS-like experience but is limited to Zulu JRE. This restriction can be a hindrance for organisations that rely on other Java runtime environments.

trivrost

trivrost is another alternative that handles JRE and Java application updates. While it simplifies updates, it does not address the security and performance issues inherent in client-side execution.


Why Choose Webswing?

Webswing offers several compelling advantages over these alternatives:

  • Enhanced Security: By running applications on the server, Webswing ensures that the source code remains protected, mitigating the risk of decompilation and unauthorised access.
  • Improved Performance: Offloading computational tasks to the server reduces the load on client machines, allowing for the use of cost-effective client hardware.
  • Broad Device Compatibility: Webswing supports a wide range of devices, including handheld devices, providing greater flexibility for users and organisations.
  • Simplified Deployment: With no need to install additional software on client machines, Webswing streamlines the deployment process, saving time and resources.

As organisations move away from the deprecated JWS, Webswing emerges as a powerful alternative that addresses the security, performance, and deployment challenges of traditional Java Web Start solutions. By leveraging server-side execution and protecting the source code, Webswing offers a secure, efficient, and flexible solution for deploying Java applications over the web.


Try it now for free!

arrow_back_ios

PreviousWebswing 24.2 Release: Filling the Gap

NextWebswing & RDP Solutions

arrow_forward_ios